Analyzing Bertrand Russell Essay

I believe what Russell was stating was that we non only need to nourish our bodies, we as well need to tend to our minds as well. We must be careful not to sink into monotony, because when we do we tend to fall back to the base instincts of direct on routine rather than using our minds. When this happens we risk starving ourselves intellectually. The hale basis of philosophy is that there is no right answer, philosophers debate and neer come to any real conclusion. Basically the foundation of philosophy is the sagacity of one or galore(postnominal), and when an answer has been validated, it shifts from opinion into fact.Once it becomes a fact, it falls into the science of facts vs falsehoods. One example would be the original thought of the cheer revolving around the earth, at the time that was a Fact. After much search it became disputed and opinionated. Now, everyone knows for a fact that the Earth is revolving around the sun kinda of vice-versa Is there a God? This ques tion allow hang on water- non-water-soluble because science arsenot prove or disprove the existence of a high power. Is there intelligent life in out there? This fate of this question organism answered is relatively higher than the previous.But currently it is insoluble due to a lack of interest in that field. Is there an futurity? This will be insoluble because it is impossible to discern due to it being impossible without experiencing it first-hand. What is the meaning of life? This question (for some reason) is on many peoples minds, but to most it will remain a mystery. When is the end? This daylight and age seems to be riddled with people who are doomsayers, who think they can see the apocalypse approaching. But in truth, no one knows how it will end, its all speculation.To me it sounds like Russell is attempting to explain that the journey through life tends to give way on most people, until they honorable shuffle from one day to the next, from rocker to grave. They ask no questions, excite no wonderment at lifes mysteries, and are content to take things at manifestation value. For those of us who look at life and question what they acquaintance or see, it leads to discussions with others, which sometimes leads to conclusions. The apple falling on Newtons head (be it a metaphorical or a literal) led to the question of gravity and how it cause objects.Despite this question leading into a purely scientific/ numeric field, I still believe it was a philosophic question, as I am sure Newton discussed his ideas with his colleagues. This being utter, I believe Aristotle said The unexamined life is not worth living. because to accept things that you see without question leads you tear a very simplistic path with no knowledge gained, whereas a life full of questions and curiosities can open up doors, not just in an individuals life but in the lives of all mankind. It is this difference that makes a life worth living.In my opinion, Russell believ ed that a life boxed in by religious or political restraints on free thinkers stifles not only the individual, but humanity as a whole. The questions we pose to ourselves and others have potentially world changing effects, whether they be for good or bad. analyze Bertrand Russell to Perictione is the common comparison of yin and yang. Bertrand seems like he wants the questions encountered through life to remain insoluble while Perictione speaks as if he wants to break down everything to its rudimentary components and discover the truth in how they operate.The reason why I am studying philosophy is truly to cure me of my narcissism, things are very drab and white to me and it is hard to see any shades of gray mingled with the two. To me there is right and wrong, facts and fallacies, despite the fact that life and all things contained in this are rarely so simple. If I can break myself of this chassis of whole steping like my opinion is superior to others then I feel like I can grow intellectually.