пятница, 22 февраля 2019 г.

Why Some Governments Are More Willing Than Others To Help Tackle Climate Change:

Climate change over is the significant change in the hide outs temper during a period of 30 years. Some governments whitethorn be much resulting than another(prenominal)s to help rule climate due(p) to advantages and disadvantages for their countries.Some governments may not agree to rigging climate change as it could affect their economy. An example of this are NCIs, for example china. China is behind the fortune production of many products therefore their ascorbic acid emissions are very high. Tackling climate change may not be in the interest of China as it could mean a negative affect on the countries proceeds and industrialisation. This may be wherefore some governments may be more leave aloneing than others to help play climate.Developing countries may also be antipathetical in tackling climate change as they may argue that it is the responsibility of MEDCs as they are the ones who emit the most carbon dioxide. They may believe that as they are not the ones c ontributing highly to climate change they should not cloak currency into tackling it. This property could be used for things such as food, clothing and medication which they may believe are more important than helping the climate. wherefore should developing countries have to suffer for the misemployd MEDCs are doing just to conk out luxurious lives. This is why developing countries may be reluctant to draw rein climate change.Some countries such as Norway are more leave aloneing to tackle climate change. This is because they believe it is in their peoples interest to tackle climate change as preventing climate change now will make a huge beneficial impact in the wide term. Norway, UK, U.S. Allocate $280 Million to Stop Deforestation. Norway has already started investing money to tackle climate change, this because of pressure from the people in Norway, to avoid strife the government has seen it is in their best interest to listen to their people and invest money in stopp ing climate change. This may be why some governments may be more willing than others to help tackle climate.Some LEDCs may want to tackle climate change as it will be very beneficial in the future. This relates to countries such as the Maldives and Bangladesh. both countries are low laying countries and if the impacts of climate change keeps getting worsened than both countries are at risk of being of being underwater due to the huge increase in sea level rise. By tackling climate change they are taking away this risk. Also it is in the interest of other countries to help them as losing a lot of get down due to flooding will mean loss of huge amounts of space.Bangladesh is thick populated if it were to lose its land the people would need to move to other countries taking over their land and space, ultimately increasing their chance of born(p) disasters. Also Maldives is a country where the government want set an example, to say what it is like to be carbon neutral. Therefore by tackling climate change now they could start a whole new revolution having a very positive impact on the world.Countries such as the Philippines will be very eager to start tackling climate change now, specially because of recent events. The government has seen the consequences of not taking action during hurricane Hyan where huge scales of damage occurred. If the Philippines had tackled climate change before they may have been able to merely many lives. Therefore countries such as the Philippines may be more willing than other to tackle climate change.

Комментариев нет:

Отправка комментария